<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenDO Project &#8211; Rationale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.open-do.org/projects/ip-217/ip217-opendo-project-rationale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.open-do.org</link>
	<description>Toward a cooperative and open framework for the development of certifiable software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:14:38 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rationale - StartTags.com</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/projects/ip-217/ip217-opendo-project-rationale/comment-page-1/#comment-9231</link>
		<dc:creator>rationale - StartTags.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?page_id=572#comment-9231</guid>
		<description>[...] reporting suggesting otherwise. On Sunday, the Washington Post published an article entitled ...OpenDO Project RationaleOpenDO Project Rationale. It is the view of the authors of this project that the primary reasons for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reporting suggesting otherwise. On Sunday, the Washington Post published an article entitled &#8230;OpenDO Project RationaleOpenDO Project Rationale. It is the view of the authors of this project that the primary reasons for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
