<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it finally time for Lean and Agile Certification?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.open-do.org/2009/06/04/is-it-finally-time-for-agile-do-178-certificationqualification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/06/04/is-it-finally-time-for-agile-do-178-certificationqualification/</link>
	<description>Toward a cooperative and open framework for the development of certifiable software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:56:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matteo bordin</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/06/04/is-it-finally-time-for-agile-do-178-certificationqualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6760</link>
		<dc:creator>matteo bordin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=467#comment-6760</guid>
		<description>It really depends on which part of an avionic system you are developing. For example, depending on the DO-178 level, you may need to provide different degrees of evidence (and perform different activities) to achieve certification/qualification. As I said in the article, lightweight processes such as verification tool qualification can rely on tool for behaviour-driven development or test0driven development, like FitNesse, Cocumber (http://cukes.info/), etc. Of course, you are likely to need to hack those tools for your specific platform.

Alternatively, heavyweight processes requires complete tools such as OSEE. On the IBM side, you can have a look at the Jazz platform. My understanding of that technology seems to indicate it could help in this context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really depends on which part of an avionic system you are developing. For example, depending on the DO-178 level, you may need to provide different degrees of evidence (and perform different activities) to achieve certification/qualification. As I said in the article, lightweight processes such as verification tool qualification can rely on tool for behaviour-driven development or test0driven development, like FitNesse, Cocumber (<a href="http://cukes.info/)" rel="nofollow">http://cukes.info/)</a>, etc. Of course, you are likely to need to hack those tools for your specific platform.</p>
<p>Alternatively, heavyweight processes requires complete tools such as OSEE. On the IBM side, you can have a look at the Jazz platform. My understanding of that technology seems to indicate it could help in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajesh</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/06/04/is-it-finally-time-for-agile-do-178-certificationqualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6506</link>
		<dc:creator>rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=467#comment-6506</guid>
		<description>i am working for avoincs, i am looking for advanced tools/improvements in the avoincs. Right now i am working for RBT(requirement based testing )using rational tools(IBM).suggest me!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am working for avoincs, i am looking for advanced tools/improvements in the avoincs. Right now i am working for RBT(requirement based testing )using rational tools(IBM).suggest me!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matteo bordin</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/06/04/is-it-finally-time-for-agile-do-178-certificationqualification/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>matteo bordin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=467#comment-92</guid>
		<description>You can follow the discussion also on the DO-178b&#039;ists Group on LinkedIn: 
http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers&amp;discussionID=3994712&amp;gid=102937&amp;commentID=4519612&amp;trk=view_disc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can follow the discussion also on the DO-178b&#8217;ists Group on LinkedIn:<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers&amp;discussionID=3994712&amp;gid=102937&amp;commentID=4519612&amp;trk=view_disc" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers&amp;discussionID=3994712&amp;gid=102937&amp;commentID=4519612&amp;trk=view_disc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

