<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concepts and Ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.open-do.org/2009/02/27/concepts-and-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/02/27/concepts-and-ideas/</link>
	<description>Toward a cooperative and open framework for the development of certifiable software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:14:38 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: concept ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/02/27/concepts-and-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-11171</link>
		<dc:creator>concept ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=159#comment-11171</guid>
		<description>[...] lines in the next few years. ... Funamizuha published in his blog a serie of ideas apliying some ...Concepts and IdeasHere are the initial concepts and ideas behind the Open-DO initiative. Cyrille Comar gave this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lines in the next few years. &#8230; Funamizuha published in his blog a serie of ideas apliying some &#8230;Concepts and IdeasHere are the initial concepts and ideas behind the Open-DO initiative. Cyrille Comar gave this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matteo Bordin</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/02/27/concepts-and-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-8725</link>
		<dc:creator>Matteo Bordin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=159#comment-8725</guid>
		<description>MDB is not playing a prominent role in DO-178C, or at least not more prominent than other approaches considered in the supplements (formal methods, object-oriented design, etc.). However, the new version of the standard acknowledges that MBD is used more and more and that there is a a general lack of knowledge on how to use it for the development of safety critical software. In particular, the Model-based Design supplement of DO-178C deals on how to meet the objectives of each criticality level when the  artifacts (high-level requirements, low-level requirements, implementation, tests, etc.) are in the form of models. For example: if the implementation is in the form of a model, how do you measure coverage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MDB is not playing a prominent role in DO-178C, or at least not more prominent than other approaches considered in the supplements (formal methods, object-oriented design, etc.). However, the new version of the standard acknowledges that MBD is used more and more and that there is a a general lack of knowledge on how to use it for the development of safety critical software. In particular, the Model-based Design supplement of DO-178C deals on how to meet the objectives of each criticality level when the  artifacts (high-level requirements, low-level requirements, implementation, tests, etc.) are in the form of models. For example: if the implementation is in the form of a model, how do you measure coverage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushma</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/02/27/concepts-and-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-8717</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=159#comment-8717</guid>
		<description>I am interested to know why MBD is playing a prominent role in DO178C.

Kindly reply back to my mail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested to know why MBD is playing a prominent role in DO178C.</p>
<p>Kindly reply back to my mail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The mystery of IP 217 revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/02/27/concepts-and-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>The mystery of IP 217 revealed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=159#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] number of presentations on Open-DO, including &#8220;Open-DO: a call to action&#8221; posted to the Open-DO web site, have mentioned something called IP 217 and several people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number of presentations on Open-DO, including &#8220;Open-DO: a call to action&#8221; posted to the Open-DO web site, have mentioned something called IP 217 and several people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is it finally time for Lean and Agile Certification/Qualification?</title>
		<link>http://www.open-do.org/2009/02/27/concepts-and-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it finally time for Lean and Agile Certification/Qualification?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.open-do.org/?p=159#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] activities: the connection with Test-Driven Development is thus evident, as explained in the Open-DO Concepts and Ideas.  So far, I&#8217;ve seen two major experiments to support lean and agile DO-178 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] activities: the connection with Test-Driven Development is thus evident, as explained in the Open-DO Concepts and Ideas.  So far, I&#8217;ve seen two major experiments to support lean and agile DO-178 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
